We and our partners use technologies, like biscuits, and collect surfing data to personalise the content and advertisements and to supply you with the best experience.
Please let us know whether you agree.
By Simon Stone
BBC Sport in Geneva
What was intended to be a crucial meeting on the path to reform in football finished with vague statements about deadlines and discussions which had been extended for another 18 weeks on Tuesday afternoon in Geneva.
It was not exactly what the European Trainers’ Association (ECA) had envisaged when they met at Malta this summer. Thenthey expected, this week they’d be finalising changes which may be passed on for rubber of the inception at 2024.
The measure of these difficulties ECA chairman Andrea Agnelli and his executive are currently confronting was emphasised in conversations away from their main press conference. The message was about the same although the tone differed slightly depending upon who spoke. Forget Plan A. Plan B is required but, in this stage, no-one is entirely sure what that needs to be.
Agnelli attempted to manage the situation however, also the Juventus chairman, normally relaxed, had no definitive responses.
It was rather unsatisfactory when Agnelli was asked if it was true he’d asked the leagues to get a reduction in the amount of teams that perform in 43,, and a 35-minute final press conference came into a terse end.
“Nono,” he said, climbing to his feet, before responding’no’ again if asked if he’d ever mentioned it.
The ECA and agnelli believe an overwhelming majority of their member clubs need reform of contest.
The initial proposal was for three contests, each with group phases. Additionally, the idea would be to get relegation and promotion between the competitions.
It was not made clear at which the additional match dates eight over the system – could come from. It was envisaged the changes would generate TV income that is increased and extend rivalry, both in regard to the amount of clubs involved and the matches they played.
Immediately, their resistance was announced by some strong voices. Their collective announcement was released by Even the Premier League clubs, and individual clubs made their feelings known.
ECA staff have spent the previous three months seeking to find common ground that would allow the formulation of a plan which may be carried. It has become clear this is impossible.
“The proposal is in the interests of all and it’s a good proposal,” explained Agnelli. “Can it be the one that arrives first at the finishing point? It may not be.”
Although no-one said it openly, in private, the blame for the current impasse is being credited to the large five leagues of Europe, from Germany, Spain, Italy, France and also England.
The atmosphere is those leagues are more worried about protecting their profitable national TV markets out of any erosion than they are about the improvement of the continent as a whole, brought on by the expansion of the game.
1 club executive from a large middle-ranking nation told BBC Sport he had no issue with England’s main clubs, nor, grudgingly, the Premier League as a complete given its validity and worldwide fascination. He questioned Italy’s sixth club must benefit from huge TV revenues, a few of which came out of his own country, while the finances of his own club reduced.
“The less attractive we are, the fewer people wish to return to our games and the faster our players want to depart for nightclubs in different countries,” he explained.
“The big leagues are solely interested in themselves. They do not care about European competition. For all of us, it is all about competition. That’s the place the point where the interest is.”
It is the self-centred pursuits of these huge championships Edwin van der Sar was talking about when the prior Netherlands and Manchester United goalkeeper, currently building a remarkable reputation as chief executive in Ajax, was speaking about when he said of the previous 3 months:”There was lots of proposals and opinions from various stakeholders – some relevant, some untrue and irrelevant, which is strange.”
“In the top, some things need pruning,” said former Crystal Palace midfielder Aki Riihalahti, currently chief executive at Finland’s most renowned club HJK Helsinki. “In the opposite end, I have seldom seen this kind of agreement. Change is needed.”
The issue is the proposals were announced with such fanfare, a component of wariness has been introduced within the procedure for knocking them back.
Despite many sources saying that initial notion is’dead’, at least one delegate Switzerland has taken an opinion which he won’t believe a notion he believed would have’disastrous’ consequences for its domestic league his club plays in has gone off, until an alternate strategy was enforced.
Suggestions that have been floated around the edges of talks from Geneva this week have included a recurrence to the second group phase.
Ideas will be carried on board or discarded, with Agnelli saying when Uefa must go into the market for its TV rights cycle that runs from 2024 as that is the deadline for change is 2022.
The odds are on a group of alterations, taking place over a time period, to revise the European football landscape, although nightclubs were warned by Agnelli not.
“We will not get past an 80% satisfaction rate,” he said.
“You shouldn’t forget the ECA is still there to guard the marketing of football across all European nations, not only a few who’ve been a little more vocal in recent months.”
Presenting the couples who plan to replicate their way to success
Get scores and headlines delivered directly to your phoneto our newsletter and also learn where to locate us on internet.
Read more here: http://test.malmass.co.id/?p=8031
