Peters v. Wayne State University, 691 F. 2d 235 (1981), cert. Pending, No. 82-794.

It’s unimportant that feminine workers in Manhart had been expected to take part in the retirement plan, whereas involvement when you look at the Arizona deferred compensation plan is voluntary. Title VII forbids all discrimination concerning “settlement, terms, conditions, or privileges of work, ” not merely discrimination concerning those components of the work relationship as to which the emp oyee doesn’t have choice. It really is likewise unimportant that the Arizona plan includes two options—the lump-sum choice and the fixed-sum-for-a-fixed-period option—that are offered on equal terms to both women and men.Continue reading→